A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours over the development of the wall at a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted countrywide focus following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members house at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a highly publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, search for to make their household household. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming produced by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment with a Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore regions are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, specifically within a delicate coastal environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which is partly constructed, is in the proper place. Their authorized crew has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal preparing disputes, exactly where sights of the sea are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering the fact that turn out to be emblematic on the depth in the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire Visible proof of the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely noted that this sort of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as readers sought to understand the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard further more submissions on no matter if interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the legal timeline.
With the Main from the dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and conditions hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is inspired by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their long-standing connection to the world and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only attempting to develop a loved ones home in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Particular Place of Conservation and say that each one operates have already been carried out based on Experienced information and authorised programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into the sea during a storm, tend not to change the underlying details.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about building of wall at coastal web page has grown to be a shorthand description for a scenario that a lot of observers see as significantly widespread. As sea amounts rise and Rene Collier and Paul Feely coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to area advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-significant water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting each the Actual physical reality from the coastline plus the symbolic character in the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an too much technique.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the result stays unsure. The court docket should ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing disorders. Nevertheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who must Are living alongside each other long once the authorized charges are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, but the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition it underscores how swiftly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partially crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend on the court’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most closely viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.